Skip to main content

Africa is the Off-Ramp Middle Powers Need

By Farshid Keramat Middle powers like Canada, Germany, and Brazil are caught in an escalating geopolitical vice. As protectionist sentiment in Washington creates new trade barriers, middle powers face growing pressure to seek alternative markets. However, reflexively pivoting toward Beijing carries significant strategic risks. China currently holds a near-monopoly on critical mineral processing, controlling over 90 percent of global battery-grade graphite and rare earth elements. Trading economic reliance on the United States for strategic dependence on China does not deliver autonomy; it merely exchanges one vulnerability for another. The true, sustainable off-ramp for middle powers lies across the Atlantic by deepening strategic trade partnerships with African economies. Long relegated to the periphery of Western foreign policy or viewed through the outdated lens of foreign aid, the African continent is undergoing a massive structural transformation. Driven by the African Cont...
Post a Comment

Africa is the Off-Ramp Middle Powers Need

Header image

By Farshid Keramat

Middle powers like Canada, Germany, and Brazil are caught in an escalating geopolitical vice. As protectionist sentiment in Washington creates new trade barriers, middle powers face growing pressure to seek alternative markets. However, reflexively pivoting toward Beijing carries significant strategic risks. China currently holds a near-monopoly on critical mineral processing, controlling over 90 percent of global battery-grade graphite and rare earth elements. Trading economic reliance on the United States for strategic dependence on China does not deliver autonomy; it merely exchanges one vulnerability for another.

The true, sustainable off-ramp for middle powers lies across the Atlantic by deepening strategic trade partnerships with African economies. Long relegated to the periphery of Western foreign policy or viewed through the outdated lens of foreign aid, the African continent is undergoing a massive structural transformation. Driven by the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), the region represents a $3.4 trillion economic ecosystem encompassing 1.4 billion people. Macroeconomic fundamentals across the continent are quietly strengthening, with projected continental GDP growth of 4.5 percent and cooling inflation rates that are comparable to many developed countries. For middle powers looking to diversify exports in green technology, agri-food, and automotive components, the AfCFTA offers an unprecedented institutional entry point.

Beyond general trade, African engagement addresses the critical mineral choke point head-on. Western-backed initiatives like the Lobito Corridor—a 2,100-kilometer rail line connecting resource-rich regions in central Africa to Atlantic ports—demonstrate how targeted infrastructure investment can offer a direct alternative to legacy Chinese supply lines. By co-investing in African extraction and local processing capacities, middle powers can secure the raw materials necessary for the green transition without exposure to Chinese state-directed leverage.

For middle powers to navigate an increasingly fragmented global order, they must reframe their foreign policy approach. Engaging African nations is not a gesture of diplomatic goodwill; it is a calculated economic necessity. By forging equal, commercial partnerships across the continent, middle powers can build supply chain resilience, diversify their export markets, and secure the true strategic autonomy they urgently need.

Editor’s Note: This article is a condensed policy digest. The full, unabridged analysis was originally published by the Tessera Research Collective. You can read the complete article here.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Redesigning Foreign Policy: The Rise of "Fashion Diplomacy"

By Farshid Keramat In the complex and often theatrical world of international relations, diplomats and world leaders have long employed a broad range of tools to convey messages, build alliances, and project national identity. Beyond the carefully chosen words of speeches and the solemn signatures on treaties, a more subtle yet increasingly powerful form of communication is emerging: “fashion diplomacy.” This term describes the deliberate and strategic use of clothing, accessories, and style by political figures to articulate specific messages, signal ideological stances, cultivate goodwill, or even instigate subtle provocations on the global stage. The recent appearance of Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in a vintage CCCP (USSR) sweater in Anchorage, Alaska, serves as a striking example of this emerging trend. Alaska and the Allure of the Past: A Sweater’s Provocative Message The image of a top diplomat from Moscow wearing the emblem ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump's Tariffs: Truth or Fiction?

By Farshid Keramat  President Trump’s tariff strategy, aimed at revitalizing American manufacturing, continues to spark debate across economic and political circles. While the intent is clear, the broader implications raise important questions about its alignment with long‑term economic trends. The U.S. manufacturing sector has steadily shrunk over the past five decades, falling from 23% of GDP in 1970 to just 9.7% in early 2025. Job losses have followed suit, prompting concern among policymakers and workers alike. Yet this decline is not unique to the United States—similar patterns are evident in Canada , Germany , and Japan . Economists point to a natural evolution in advanced economies: agriculture gives way to manufacturing, which is eventually overtaken by services. In the U.S., the service sector has expanded from 71.8% of GDP in 1997 to 83.7% in 2025, driving employment growth and con...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Multilateralism the Answer to Preserving the Rules-Based Global Order?

By Farshid Keramat It is evident that the world is changing. The strategic withdrawal by the United States from the global rules‑based system has raised new questions about the future of global governance. Most nations continue to hold on to the principles of global collaboration, and for good reason. The existing system has allowed for unparalleled economic growth in the post–World War II era through free trade. Can the rules‑based system survive? I believe the existing global governance structure can be preserved through the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‑Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The CPTPP: A Shield and a Standard‑Setter The CPTPP is one of the most sophisticated trade agreements in the world, encompassing free trade in goods and services, robust intellectual property protection, facilitated business travel, stringent labor standards, and government procurement opportunities. The trading bloc consists primarily of ...
Post a Comment
Read more